Question:
Why deny that Obama is not a socialist at heart? ?
Obama will lose!
2008-08-19 17:50:38 UTC
Obama's socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat. Later, the Chicago DSA newsletter reported that Obama, as a state senator, showed up to eulogize Saul Mendelson, one of the "champions" of "Chicago's democratic left" and a long-time socialist activist. Obama's stint as a "community organizer" in Chicago has gotten some attention, but his relationship with the DSA socialists, who groomed and backed him, has been generally ignored.

In his 1995 autobiography Dreams From My Father, Obama reveals that during his student years at New York’s Columbia University he “went to socialist conferences at Cooper Union and African cultural fairs in Brooklyn.” The socialist conferences he cites were those of the SSC. As Trevor London observes, “Obama speaks of ‘conferences’ plural, indicating [that] his attendance was not the result of accident or youthful curiosity.”

Co-founded in 1992 by Daniel Cantor (a former staffer for Jesse Jackson's 1988 presidential campaign) and Joel Rogers (a sociology and law professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison), the New Party was a Marxist political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials -- most often Democrats. The New Party’s short-term objective was to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the eventual rise of new Marxist third party.

Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the militant organization ACORN. The party’s Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.

In 1995 Barack Obama sought the New Party’s endorsement for his 1996 state senate run. He was successful in obtaining that endorsement, and he used a number of New Party volunteers as campaign workers.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=800
Fourteen answers:
GooglePhotography.com
2008-08-19 17:56:48 UTC
So true. We need freedom and peace in our nation. We do not need to evolve into a worse version of Canada. Where are our leaders? Where are our principles of a free nation and a free people that have slipped away in wave after wave of shallow politicians with self interest? Would our leaders die for our nation as the founding fathers did?
anonymous
2008-08-20 01:14:43 UTC
A neocon blog= facts!!!!! LOL



Obama/Democrats are not Socialists/Marxist! First of all Marxist are

very much for government control of every thing. Liberal or

Conservative is only half of politics. The other half is just as

important because it allows you to tell leftists like Stalin and

Gandhi apart.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahatma_Gandhi - who was

much like Martin Luther King). Democrats (including Obama) are often

more Libertarian (ie: gay rights, most against wiretapping, civil

rights in the past) Republicans tend to be more Authoritarian (ie,

wiretapping).

By adding the social dimension you can show that Stalin was an

authoritarian leftist (ie the state is more important than the

individual) and that Gandhi, believing in the supreme value of each

individual, is a libertarian leftist.

http://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2.

Obama is a Libertarian Leftist (or at least not Authoritarian)

Socialists/Marxists are Authoritarian. If you don't believe me, look

it up.

Feel free to copy and paste this to Yahoo! Answers.



You can find it on my profile.
anonymous
2008-08-20 01:05:13 UTC
Tacking the word socialist on a person gives it a negative connotation. In truth Obama would like the wealthy to pay more taxes to help out poor people who truly need a leg up in the world. Have you ever wondered why gasoline in Europe costs about 2.5 times the cost in the US? Virtually everyone in Europe has health care. A gasoline tax helps pay for this. Nobody needs to go without. Somebody has to pay for it. In our country there are millions of people doing without. It needn't be that way.
Jazzy
2008-08-20 00:57:16 UTC
Wow, I'm not even going to read this. You are seriously obsessed. I'm not saying that I like everything about socialism, but if you hate is so much then...



stop going to school

don't use public transportation

don't go to the library

when someone breaks into your home, don't call the police

when your house is on fire don't expect the fire department to come



Those are just some of the socialist-based ideas and programs we have in the United States that I'm very well sure you take full advantage of.
cmw
2008-08-20 15:42:05 UTC
Do you know what a double negative is? I'm sure you're not aware of it, but your question states that Obama is not a socialist.



As someone above pointed out, if you oppose social action so much, you should never call the police or fire department, use a library or public park. These are all provided by "socialist" policies.
anonymous
2008-08-20 01:00:13 UTC
You are a liar. The New Party is not Marxist or anything of the sort, just another pathetic little community umbrella organization trying to make the world a better place. Doesn't even exist anymore.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Party_(USA)



You are also lying about ACORN, but anyone could look that up as well.
Samara P
2008-08-20 01:03:35 UTC
Good Question. Have you ever considered something new?. Maybe you should try http://HoneyDipCity.com - Find a Honey and http://www.FriendTab.com to Find Local Singles
Joe D
2008-08-20 00:59:51 UTC
He is a democrat. Perhaps you need to do some research before you post anything.
anonymous
2008-08-20 01:01:27 UTC
He is,they know and don't want to say it Why do you think they favor him over the pond Why to you think he has change his position so many times? They know he does not mean what he is saying Just as with the Clinton's and Monica and the sniper fire they don't care about the truth means nothing to them
LeAnne
2008-08-20 00:55:16 UTC
Obama has one of the most liberal voting records on Capital Hill - he's not a "socialist at heart," he's a socialist with every fiber of his being.
anonymous
2008-08-20 00:57:12 UTC
Obama supporters stay in a perpetual state of denial.
Confused Republican
2008-08-20 00:53:20 UTC
Everything I've ever seen from discoverthenetworks.org has turned out to be a lie. Why should this latest post be any different?
2Cute2B4Got
2008-08-20 00:54:47 UTC
I am so sick of you Obama haters. I think I will just have to vote for him. He must be good, if all you can do is talk about him.
City of the blind
2008-08-20 00:57:35 UTC
He's more than a socialist he is a radical........How did he ever get into office?


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...