Question:
How did the GOP fix the Primary elections so Ron Paul would not win any states?
psychosolodiver
2012-04-24 10:11:40 UTC
Ron Paul was ahead in many major polls, but ended up not winning any states. Anyone else smell something bad? Like election fraud?
Fourteen answers:
Maxinquaye
2012-04-24 10:14:57 UTC
Media coverage. FOX news wanted Romney, so they went against every other candidate and pushed Romney.
?
2012-04-24 10:50:39 UTC
Voter fraud is NOT a partisan issue; the GOP does it now, and probably did so in 2000, but the Dems engaged in it in 08 and would gleefully do it again. The GOP and the Democrats are basically the same party; just 2 separate factions. If the GOP didn't use voter fraud to ice Ron Paul, and he got the nomination, in the general, the Democrats would ice Ron Paul.



There was voter fraud since the inception. When Ron Paul won all of these straw polls last year, the GOP establishment got worried, so they carefully formulated a plan to ensure that Ron Paul does not speak for their party, despite people's wishes.



The very first state that held a primary was the victim of a gargantuan amount of voter fraud. In Iowa, the votes are always counted at Des Moines, but "suddenly" the establishment moved the place where they are tallied to a secret location. But I'm sure this had absolutely nothing to do with Ron Paul leading in every poll of Iowans!!!!!!!!!



Voter fraud is fairly simple; it's just like sending a trojan horse virus to another computer. I'm certain that Ron Paul probably recieves about 1/3 of the votes he should actually recieve. We never actually "choose" the people who lead us; they are installed by the ruling class; it's the ultimate trick- they know with 100% certainty who will be President, but allow us to hold elections to keep up the facade that we have a democracy and the people's voices count!



This type of computer-based vote fraud will continue until enough people take a stand and do something about it.
?
2012-04-24 16:39:01 UTC
It's on the news how votes in many states were falsified, and how many other states were turning away Ron Paul voters, etc.



Even more important is why mainstream media has picked that up, to a certain extent. I'm sure you've heard the rumor of Obama wanting to terminate the 2012 elections? One was to do so is by severe abuse of election processes... this can give him valid reason to suspend the elections, pending an investigation. Why else would some mainstream media who would not have Dr. Paul on their news, now be like "omg, Ron Paul votes missing." etc. ?
Makisupa
2012-04-24 17:09:10 UTC
Algorithmic vote flipping is one theory. But fear not, He's getting the delegates and could very well deprive Romney of the necessary delegates to win the nomination on the first ballot at the convention. If this happens then Ron Paul has a very good shot at the nomination.
2012-04-24 10:21:50 UTC
Maybe people just lied to the poll takers. IF you ever find any proof for your spurious allegation that ANYONE fixed ANY election, I suggest you find the guts to take your evidence to the proper authorities. In the meanwhile, STOP WHINING!!
Robby216
2012-04-24 10:15:02 UTC
What polls? Conducted by whom?



How do you know it wasn't the Dems pulling stunts?



Here's what's HILARIOUS. The Dems are constantly crying about voter fraud and disenfranchised voters, yet they have not produced one - anywhere.



Yet, when someone "finds" a bunch of ballots in the trunk of their car that they forgot to turn in, they are 90% democrat votes, and you don't find that strange at all. When the Black Panthers are standing in front of the polls with weapons in their hands, intimidating white voters, you don't see anything wrong with that.



What color is the sky in your world?



.
Dan L Boun
2012-04-24 11:15:59 UTC
I wouldn't argue election fraud, in Republican ranks... But Paul has won, at least two states....
2012-04-24 10:15:57 UTC
The sneaky GOP tricked most republicans into voting for someone else.
?
2012-04-24 10:14:42 UTC
No one fixed anything(as you're implying). People simply don't agree with Ron Paul.
2012-04-24 10:15:06 UTC
Easy. In any state where he would have cemented the lead....they didn't count the votes.



-you can call me a liar but all you have to do is look at Maine and North Dakota.



The info is out there....they just don't publicize it.
u_bin_called
2012-04-24 10:15:11 UTC
the same way lonelygirl21 was denied her rightful oscar statue and the diet coke & mentos guys were denied their nobel for science...





....internet popularity does not equal real-world relevance....
We Trod Upon You
2012-04-24 10:13:48 UTC
They forced RP and his supporters to speak in uber generalities that mean absolutely nothing thereby preventing RP from gaining any new supporters.
wizjp
2012-04-24 10:12:23 UTC
The let him enter the primaries and run on his platform.



'nuff said
?
2012-04-24 10:54:38 UTC
They didn't... Once again-Polls mean nothing.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...