Question:
What about the evidence that Baby Trig is really Sarah Palin's grandson, not her son?
confidential3
2008-09-09 21:43:07 UTC
Her 16-year-old daughter was kept out of school for 5 months before Trig was born, supposedly becaue of "mono" though no medical records were ever made public. The baby's birth certificate has never been made public. It was an easy cover-up for Sarah to pretend her water had broken, and to fly home to be there when her daughter gave birth, then pretend to the world that the baby was hers. People around her saw her all the time and never thought she was pregnant.
34 answers:
annie w
2008-09-09 21:47:03 UTC
Why should the daughter's medical records be made public. Better question is why should the baby's birth certificate be made public. Obama won't even produce his and he is running for President, but you want a baby's birth certificate. ***

EDIT: I find it humorous that people think it is her responsibility to produce medical records and birth certificates for her entire family, when they don't expect the same from Obama. ***
2008-09-11 08:56:00 UTC
Okay, we've seen the Sarah "proof pregnant picture" now, at what, 7 or 8 months? here it is - http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/



And yet, here's 2 other supposed pictures of her at 7 months, one from 89, the other last spring - http://www.giftsandfreeadvice.com/free_advice/sarah-palin-old-pregnant-photo-and-her-2008-pregnant-7-months-photo-lets-get-real/



Palin supporters must recognize that the elements to the "official story" are suspect to say the least. "Mono" for 5 months that just happens to coincide with the birth? Transferring high schools as a popular junior? Taking a flight from Texas to Alaska after water breaks, without alerting the crew or them noticing? Informing your staff that you're 7 months pregnant - and no one could tell? Bristol's traffic accident and tickets when she's supposed to be home sick? Getting pregnant when she's got such a severe case of mono she can't go to school?



People, stop telling us to do the math. If it's really Bristol's baby of course they're going to say 5 months. Right, like they're going to say, oh she's just 3 to 4 months pregnant. Hello! Saying 5 months means nothing, math professors.



And yes, this is important. The American people and the world in general have a right to know if this woman is already involved in a cover-up.



Why would the baby of the Governor of Alaska's birth be such a big secret? Seems like it would be front page news with photos for proud Wasilla.
roadster9879
2008-09-09 21:49:32 UTC
This is not evidence at all. It is just wild and insane speculation by people living in a fantasy world.



Teenage children do not give birth to Downs syndrome babies. Additionally, there are tons of medical records that proove Sarah Palin is the mother. And, if you look closely, it has only been several months, and she still has a little bit of baby tummy showing though her glamorus dresses.



This is more proof of how sick and demented the Democrats have become.
sunluvr_1976
2008-09-09 21:52:32 UTC
I am very anti-Palin, but I am finding it hard to understand why it even matters who the mother of the baby is.

She sure looks good for having 5 kids, the last being six months old or so.



I am more worried about the other issues that are coming out about her. I don't agree at all with her social views and she knows nothing about foreign affairs.



Check out factcheck.org to get the truth about what these guys are saying. There seems to be more dishonesty on the Republican side, but I will admit they have a few things on Obama too.
goodshepard@rocketmail.com
2008-09-13 09:34:51 UTC
For arguments sake, let’s say it is her child. If that is the case then she was grossly negligent and reckless. First she gave a speech and then flew for EIGHT hours at the risk of getting an infection after her water broke to have the baby in Alaska. She didn't notify the airline that she was pregnant in case they would have had to make an emergency landing. So if it is her child, it shows a huge lack of judgment.



Either way she has shown a lack of judgment that makes her unfit to be the Vice-President of the United States.
lulu muffin
2008-09-09 21:51:34 UTC
If she was faking the pregnancy that was actually her daughter's, wouldn't she have stayed close to home during her daughter's last trimester? If this was a ploy, then it was incredibly poorly planned and remarkably successful. As far as there being no photos of her pregnant, take a look at these:

http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/08/30/dailykos-rumors-debunked-here-is-sarah-palin-pregnancy-photo-on-feb-10th-2008/

It is not her obligation to provide private information to debunk a ridiculous rumor. This is old news. Obama says drop it, even Michael Moore says drop it, so DROP IT ALREADY!
richard t
2008-09-09 21:54:13 UTC
When you post your medical records on Yahoo, Governor Palin will post hers and her daughter's.



I've yet to see your birth certificate either. Were you born?



Aren't you part of the crowd crying about loss of freedoms and invasion of privacy? or do those freedoms only exist for left wing nut jobs in this country anymore?
2008-09-13 21:50:37 UTC
She couldn't believe the allegations that Trig may not be hers, and she responded with, "....do they want to see my stretch marks to prove it?!"

Seriously. The ***** has had 4 kids...I bet she has some stretch marks. I'm sure she flew home leaking amniotic fluid for 8 hours. If that is the truth, she really is an ignorant woman. This kind of "toughness" scares me worse than Bush. Help us
Jenny C
2008-09-09 21:55:30 UTC
before you discuss rumors that have long ago been proven false you should check snopes.com for whether you are spreading lies. Also if you watched Greta Van Susteren's reports on Sarah Palin you would have seen several videos of a very visibly pregnant Sarah in April of this year!!
2008-09-09 21:55:13 UTC
now I personally don't like Palin, but I don't think that her children health and birth records are really any of our business, unless she chooses to share it. that comes from me as a mother. you can have my records, but my children should have some sort of privacy. She deserves no less rights for her childrens records.



I think she should worry more about her childrens needs, but not sharing this information is protecting her children. which is what a mother does. period.
RT
2008-09-09 21:47:52 UTC
impossible... the child was born 4 months ago and the daughter is five months pregnant. So unless nature works differently in Alaska, its simply a smear tactic.
Aaron S
2008-09-09 21:48:04 UTC
What evidence? The evidence left wing BLOGGERS put out there? Do the math, it would have been impossible for her daughter to have given birth to that child.
Marina
2008-09-09 21:46:48 UTC
Which evidence? What hard proof is there? I'll wait....in the meantime ask yourself why all of Obama's records are not made public....school transcripsts, health records.....go ahead and try to find those and ask why he has them hidden.
bmoc2525
2008-09-09 21:48:56 UTC
Keep up the lies it only helps the McCain campaign.



No one needs to prove that the baby is Sarah's.



You need to prove it is not.
merlin_steele
2008-09-09 21:49:39 UTC
I would really like to know more about this myself. I've heard the rumors, but haven't really read any news stories or stories at all from Alaska on it.



Plus the deal with the bridge, that's not as clear cut her being the champ on that one either, from what I hear. I think some of the repubs are grasping at any seemingly viable candidate they can for their run for prez/vice prez this year.
jh
2008-09-09 21:47:53 UTC
This has as much credibility as proving Biden caused the event that killed his wife.



and... Obama snorted coke and is a nicotine addict... oh wait, those things are true.
keep calm carry on
2008-09-09 21:48:18 UTC
how can u have a baby 5 months ago...and be 5 months pregnant?
Michael
2008-09-09 21:50:30 UTC
Source of this B.S......I thought so don't have any. Please just admit that your boy Obama is through and go down in defeat with some vestige of honor
2008-09-09 21:47:45 UTC
trig is under 5 months old



Bristol is over 5 months pregnant



END OF STORY
2008-09-09 21:51:12 UTC
Put your foil helmet back on and stop reading propaganda web sites.
dam
2008-09-09 21:50:25 UTC
I think you should look around for some better news sources.

N.E.W.S.

North

East

West

South

And that's all news should be.
2008-09-09 21:50:00 UTC
Got any evidence? You guys are a joke!!!
Pelosi & Lefts Ruined California
2008-09-09 21:46:45 UTC
Her 16 year old who is now 17 is pregnant FIVE MONTHS, the baby is THREE MONTHS old! You do the Math!



How many teenagers have DOWN SYNDROME Babies? Do you guys have any education at all?
Brian G
2008-09-09 21:48:02 UTC
As much as im a Dem, don't be an idiot. And its gets lonely in Alaska. Very few women. Please, just shh.
Expat Mike
2008-09-09 21:47:47 UTC
I still wonder why the McCain/Palin campaign refuses to release Sarah Palin's medical records leading up to Trig's birth to end these rumors once and for all. What's there that she doesn't want us to see?
Teener501
2008-09-09 21:46:32 UTC
Bury it dude. Trust me just bury it.
Sage Bluestorm
2008-09-09 21:49:27 UTC
It is kind of suspicious but until some hard evidence is produced I think we just have to go on all the other scandals, hypocrisies and lies she has produced.
J
2008-09-09 21:46:57 UTC
What evidence?
older
2008-09-09 21:54:12 UTC
PURE HOG WASH
Banker
2008-09-09 21:47:36 UTC
I disagree.

trash talk.
2008-09-09 21:47:15 UTC
It is Bristol's child and she is going to cover it up as long as possible.
2008-09-09 21:45:49 UTC
your hurting
sweetassugarbajbe
2008-09-09 21:46:09 UTC
That's disturbing and she's about to spit out another one. Such class!
Derrick E
2008-09-09 21:45:46 UTC
Ouch!



I hear some right wingers crying.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...