Question:
Would you consider BIN-LADIN terroris or Bush, Read Details First Than Answer.?
2006-10-03 00:51:25 UTC
Bin Ladin is a man who is invisible terrorist who attacks the POWERFULL COUNTRIES like US UK and so on. While Bush is a visible person who is showing his activities in the world i.e. IRAQ ,AFGHANISTAN ,PELESTINE. and so on He is killing the inocent people of the countries like mentioned above. terrorism is all over the world why dont he try to attack a powerfull country like France ,Germany and now INDIA+PAKISTAN+CHINA+IRAN. WHY?
33 answers:
Trainman
2006-10-03 01:44:06 UTC
I am no supporter of George Bush Jr or his foreign policies. But you appear to be trying to justify Bin Laden's vile crimes (and those of his disgusting, bigoted supporters) by saying that he only attacks "powerful countries." What utter rubbish. The Bali bombing was aimed mainly at innocent, defenceless Australian holidaymakers. Australia is hardly known for interfering in the affairs of other countries. Their only "crime" was not being Muslim (although some might have been for all I know).



You have also sought to disguise the fact that Bin Laden and his disgusting, bigoted supporters murdered fifty-two innocent, defenceless civilians (some of them Muslims) on the London Underground - MY WORK PLACE - and tried to do the same again two weeks later. Oh, and by the way, did you hear about the Twin Towers? How powerful were the innocent, defenceless people (some of them Muslims) when they were murdered in the buildings, on-board the planes and on the ground?



Apparently murder is OK when Muslims are murdering westerners, but not when westerners attack Muslim countries.



As to why the USA et al do not attack the other countries you mention, the answers are as follows:



France: no reason to attack as they are allies.



Germany: no reason to attack as they are allies, although in the past the USA has fought them in two major conflicts.



India: A friendly country which is not threatening their interests.



Pakistan: although terrorists reside within it's borders, the regime is trying to root them out.



China: A rapidly emerging challenger to the USA's economic power, but as far as I recall the Chinese have not launched any military attacks recently against the USA. They did come to blows in the 1950-53 Korean war.



Iran: There have been military skirmishes between the USA and Iran. And if President Armour Dinner Jacket continues to behave in the way he has been doing, i.e. threatening the destruction of Israel and developing nuclear weapons technology, then Iran may be next on Bush's hit list.
David AKA Dr Reason
2006-10-03 23:28:19 UTC
If I would lay out all the facts about Bin Ladin, and exposed all his murderous past and all his plans and goals. You would just love him all the more. Nothing I can show you will change your belief, and all your best reasoning will not change my view of Bin Ladin.

Just strap on your explosive belts and let's get this over with

Or we can just agree to disagree, and be civil toward each other.
fatboysdaddy
2006-10-03 09:35:06 UTC
Bin Ladin is the terrorist! President Bush is not killing the Palestine people they are doing that to themselves.
2016-10-15 15:22:41 UTC
NOPE! surely, you are able to ingredient your finger at bill Clinton. back whilst he became into president, he became into surpassed Bin weighted down on a silver platter, basically bill became into too busy enjoying golf to end and sign the order. for constructive, Bin weighted down have been given away and concealed interior the hills of Afghanistan. That became into our ONE and basically probability at a sparkling shot on Bin weighted down. As bill left workplace, he whispered into George's ear that Bin weighted down became right into a probability. Now considering the fact that 911 Bush has spent a fortune bribing informants to capture Bin weighted down. even nonetheless Bush has controlled to take out a number of Bin weighted down's good hand adult men, we've by no potential gotten Bin weighted down himself. there became into another time that we virtually had him, however the operation had to be aborted on the final minute, because of the fact of inadequate adult men. hiya! it is not precisely like a map quest adventure going after Bin weighted down. the guy is continually shifting from one cave to a various to keep away from capture. it would be like attempting to discover a needle in a haystack that became into being tossed around. for this reason, we are searching for one guy interior the mountains of Afghanistan, style of impossible. So, my pal, it is not Bush it rather is a failure, yet extremely Clinton, who did not grab the 2nd, whilst he became into the president. all of us understand what Bush might do and all of us understand what Clinton did not do. My question to you is what might Obama do with Bin weighted down, if he had the prospect? not lots!
elymendoza1984
2006-10-06 03:00:39 UTC
Bin Ladin is an Evil person for allowing, planning, and carrying out the murder of innocent civilians working in the World Trade Center. He is a monster. There is no correcting that and making him a martyr of any form.



Bin Ladin should roast in Hell as far as I am concerned. And Bush should join him for letting all our Soldiers die in Foreign lands - and for what???



I am saddened by the whole Human Condition that is the world we live in. God would not want it that way. His Children are killing each other in his name. AND FOR WHAT???



Anyone who kills another person in the name of Greed, religion or what have you does not deserve to live in peace.



We will all be judged in the end. Whether you like it or not.
Tws
2006-10-03 01:14:01 UTC
Firstly let me say that I am no friend of George Bush and believe that the Iraq invasion was poorly thought out. It was not Bush who flew planes into the WTC and killed thousands of innocent people, including Muslims, it was not Bush who trained suicide bombers and others to commit atrocities in Bali, Madrid and London amongst others. Bin Ladin is a murderer and does not care if Muslims get killed when he orders his followers to attack. In answer to your last point the governments of these countries DO NOT support terrorists and try to catch anybody involved in plotting terrorism. Finally it is Bin Laden that has put every Muslim under suspicion because of his activities not Bush or Blair..
2006-10-03 09:05:24 UTC
Bin Laden is a terrorist, but I don't think Bush is. I think Bush has started something that he can no longer control, but will not admit to it. He needs to get our people out of Iraq, Afghanistan, wherever, and get them home where they can protect their own country. It is useless to be over there because those people like it just the way they are and will never change. My thoughts.
MGN2006
2006-10-03 01:22:32 UTC
France & Germany have not planned or implemented any acts of terrorism against the US or the UK, whereas Osama Bin Laden has and needs to be stopped at all costs. The world must learn that terrorism will not be tolererated and powerful nations have a moral obligation to eliminate terrorism so that less powerful countries may prosper
Lick_My_Toad
2006-10-03 01:08:06 UTC
Bin Laden is deliberately targetting innocent people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Spain, France, Germany, USA, UK, and so on. Bush is just trying to fight a war and, at the same time, he killing lots of his friends, neutrals, and allies. The Yanks invented "friendly fire". That does not make Bush a terrorist, just clumsy.
2006-10-03 01:08:35 UTC
On this board, you will get only creepy Zionist characters who will ignore your question and write a silly comment unrelated to what you are asking and then report you ( typical Mosada tricks ).

To answer your question, yes Blank Bush is the biggest terrorist accompanied by the Israeli mosad agents all over the middle east ,Pakistan and Afghanistan.

There was never a proof than Shaikh Osama (may live long to see Muslim Empire free of Kafers ) got any thing to do with the twin towers but plenty of evidences that it was an inside job with the help of the 22 Mosadis who were deported from the States immediately after the incident.
pal6
2006-10-05 11:22:45 UTC
Bin-ladin most be frighten of death because he has to hide his *** behind silly buggers believe everything that he says. They kill while he sits there smiling in some hole. Has anyone even seen where they going to end up once they killed themselves.

They definite not going be joining they God, but the Devil himself in hell where Bin-ladin himself Will be going one day.
2006-10-06 15:13:26 UTC
A Bully only attacks the WEAK!!!!Bush has NO BALLS for IRAN OR N KOREA!!!!!
2006-10-03 01:05:46 UTC
bush is more of a fascist than a terrorist. our government has become an authoritarian regime. usually fascists have a little more gusto and pick on bigger countries. bush goes after those he thought he could kick their butts. but we are still losing. and he wants to take on iran and venezuela now but our military has been devistated by years in iraq and afghanistan. i think hitler was at least credited with some intelligence.
Mariam
2006-10-03 01:16:41 UTC
They are both terrorists. They have both attacked and killed civilians. You can't praise or condemn one without doing the same to the other.



I think people on both sides of the fence are a product of some truth and some lies. Us as civilians don't know the full picture. Many people think Bin Laden started the war by attacking the World Trade Centre, others think that attacking the world trrade centre was a response to attacks and oppression in the Middle East over decades.



We mustn't quarell amongst ourselves, we should seek the truth and be unbiased. i.e muslims not sympathising with Bin Laden (f he was to blame) and christians or the west not blindlessy supporting Bush if it becomes more evident that he had a large share of the fault.



The fact is these people (bush and bin laden) are hiding the truth from us and wanting us to belive what they want us to believe for their own cause.
Pandak
2006-10-03 01:04:47 UTC
The US is a bully, and bullies always pick on the smallest and weakest. That's why.



Both Bin Laden and Bush are extremists and fundamentalists in their different religions, both of which want to kill each other off (or convert each other, which is impossible). Bin Laden's way is to attack men, women and children in powerful countries to try to bring them down; Bush's way is to attack men, women and children in the weak countries in the hope that they'll turn against Bin Laden. War and conflict is the way of weak men. Hopefully, one day men of peace will emerge on both sides.
2006-10-03 01:00:00 UTC
Since the second World War, I don't recall Germany being a threat to modern civilisation, nor France for that matter. The rest, well, you don't pick on people that might beat you up eh?
paul m
2006-10-03 01:20:54 UTC
As bin laden instigated the war on terror in the first place then there is only one answer. You can even take the start back further than 9/11 with his original bombing on the world trade centre and the motor boat bombing of the USS Cole. In Iraq by far the majority of civilians have been killed by insurgents through suicide bombings etc.

Another point is none of the allies in the war on terror have attacked Palestine only Israel and from the information I see on the news it is usually in response to a suicide bombing, mortar attack or something similar.

Personally I think Bush and Blair for that matter are idiots but in this scenario they are not the instigators of violence.

As regards to India,China and Iran as things stand there is no reason for anyone to attack them. Pakistan and India have a long history of bloody border disputes so they may have a larger scale conflict in the future.

Attacking France or Germany that is ridiculous as both are Allies, perhaps not in the actual fighting but you can guarantee a large amount of intelligence is passed around.



Oh by the way voltage Bush will be gone in 2 years regardless.
KP
2006-10-03 00:59:29 UTC
you arent asking a question, you are trying to make people think a certain thing. Thats propaganda. Bin Ladin killed a lot of innocent people here. Long live Israel!
kate
2006-10-03 01:02:25 UTC
Ok your pic answers a lot.

First off, Bush is doing a lot better job than you are, sitting on your *** trying to find ways that Bush is worse than Bin Laden.

Anyways....Bin Laden killed thousands of people and those people that are in Iraq are serving our country..they had a choice.

grow up get a life and go back to iraq.
2006-10-03 00:56:04 UTC
Nice picture!
asru
2006-10-04 08:27:52 UTC
no doubt that answer is GW Bush.
Cori
2006-10-03 01:01:10 UTC
Why would he attack those other countries? He isn't just wanting to have a war with someone! Anyone who kills is wrong I agree. What I don't understand is why they don't just all leave each other alone. If someone wants to live for some fictional messed up god then that's up to them, just keep it to themselves & don't feel that they have to kill in the name of their god. That is just stupid. There is nothing good or holy about killing anyone.
Timothy M
2006-10-03 12:07:21 UTC
Firstly, I am not American, but have helped campaign for both Al Gore and John Kerry, therefore I think it can be assumed that I do not support George W Bush or anything that he stands for. As a UK citizen, and Labour Party member, I campaigned long and hard to oppose the war in Iraq (the only reason I didn't resign my Party membership was because my then-Member of Parliament was equally opposed to the war).



Having said that you cannot compare Bin Laden and Bush. There is a fundament flaw in your question in that you describe Bin Laden as an "invisible terrorist"; if he is so "invisible" how come he keeps appearing on Al-Jazeera supporting attacks on the "Western infidels"?



Bush does not try to attack "powerful" countries "like France and Germany...and India" because they are his allies, as is (for now) Pakistan. It is my belief that if he had the military capability he would attack Iran, but he has too many troops in Afghanistan and Iraq to do this.



As for Palestine, Bush is not the only person to blame. American Presidents of all political persuasions have been to tolerant of Israel BUT as long as members of the Palestinian government deny Israel's right to exist then theyy (the Palestinians) will lose a lot of support where it most matters in the US.
2006-10-03 01:00:06 UTC
Bin Ladin attacks tries to kill innocent people Bush doesn't try to kill innocent people but sometimes people get caught in the cross fire Bush is trying to kill people that target innocent people and as far as Iran we are coming closer to war we don't want them to get the atomic bomb
Miss T
2006-10-03 01:18:00 UTC
They are both terrorists!!! It really doesnt matter who or where you attack, invisible or not, @ the end of the day its still terrorism, And unfortunately a lot of innocent people get caught up in their nonsensical mess!!! All these wars are really not necessary... they are just aleviating worse problems than solving them.
?
2006-10-03 08:10:35 UTC
They are both immoral prefering to harm innocents than try to work things out peacfully.
2006-10-03 01:03:34 UTC
ok, lets go back to the playground here, bin-ladin started it.
2006-10-03 02:42:14 UTC
I cant understand these questions

what the hell u r asking for

to these disgusting , irritating n nonsense people

they dont know truth

they r only following fabricated media

do they know anything about killing of innocent people?

these people r making fun of ur question

n this is obvious ...... dont you know who is terrorist

then why do u want their views

the only thing u should do is to pray for ur community n for all muslimeen
2006-10-03 08:22:23 UTC
First of all the ppl here seem to be judging you based on your picture... That in its self shows the Intelligence level of the Neo Conservative sheep following their Shepard GWB...



I find myself asking the same questions... Shortly after 9-11 Bush Declared a Global War on Terror. However, He did nothing to the Militants performing Genocide in Darfur, He did nothing about the Israelis attacking Palestine.... He did noting to prevent Hamas from attacking Israel,,,,He did nothing to prevent Hezbollah from attacking Israel....



He did however attack Iraq who has no links to terrorism at all.... Now that situation has resulted in a Civil War in Iraq...



I want to know what is going on and why HE can not be Impeached...



I do not agree with Religious Driven Terror no matter what form it comes in... Christan or Islamic....



I'd finger Bush as the man responsible for all these civilians being killed by militants... It's his fault that Iraq is in such a disarray.... More Iraqis have died under Bush than under Saddam Hussein....



Maybe Saddam was not a moral character but he had his people in check... Now he is gone and they are killing each other....



In my opinion Bush and Bin Laden are equally as evil....



I don't expect to get best answer if the public votes... Because the responses I have read are Race and hate Driven....none based on facts....
aamirm77
2006-10-03 00:54:58 UTC
I don't know but your picture sure looks good
2006-10-03 22:02:51 UTC
You're kind of cute. Will you let me sodomize you?
bragamania
2006-10-05 02:20:33 UTC
Hey Mughal,



Every time I hear the word "terrorism" or "terror" I realise that it has completely lost its meaning. It used to mean something truly blood-chillingly frightening! Now it means nothing, through constant over-use, and it's tiresome.



Instead let's ask the question: who is the SCARIEST?



Bin Laden has now become an idea, promoted to unimaginable heights by George Bush (there's no such thing as bad press). Bin Laden doesn't train anyone anymore, he doesn't blow up buildings, he doesn't kill anyone, he merely inspires! Bin Laden has now become immortal, and dead or alive, he will always live on in the minds and aspirations of angry Muslims. Extremists who, in Rushdie's words, don't just want to stop time, but turn it back 1000 years!



That is incredibly scary... How do you kill off an idea?



But Bush... Bush HAS no idea. One of the most idiotic, incoherent, uninspiring, un-eloquent, dribbling morons to have ever lived has in his hands the most powerful killing tools in the history of mankind. He is as religiously deluded as BL, but without the charisma, and quite clearly too stupid to create foreign policy, which is obviously being controlled by... who knows?

Unlike Bin Laden we know when Bush will be gone. What we don't know is how much irreparable damage he will cause in that short space of time. Bin Laden is Muslim resistance personified, and you can't kill that off unless you:



a) kill off every single Muslim alive (an act that would truly deserve the accolade of "TERROR")



or



b) Change the US's arrogant, spiteful, blood-stained foreign policy enough to allow Muslims to swallow their obtuse sense of pride, and accept that there will never be a re-instatement of that great Mughal empire of a bygone primitive era.
Voltage Transformer 33kV
2006-10-03 01:17:48 UTC
The World Can't Wait: Drive Out the Bush Regime!



On October 5, people everywhere will walk out of school, take off work, and come to the downtowns & townsquares and set out from there, going through the streets and calling on many more to join us - making a powerful statement: "NO! THIS REGIME DOES NOT REPRESENT US! AND WE WILL DRIVE IT OUT!"



YOUR GOVERNMENT, on the basis of outrageous lies, is waging a murderous and utterly illegitimate war in Iraq, with other countries in their sights.



YOUR GOVERNMENT is openly torturing people, and justifying it.



YOUR GOVERNMENT puts people in jail on the merest suspicion, refusing them lawyers, and either holding them indefinitely or deporting them in the dead of night.



YOUR GOVERNMENT is moving each day closer to a theocracy, where a narrow and hateful brand of Christian fundamentalism will rule.



YOUR GOVERNMENT suppresses the science that doesn't fit its religious, political and economic agenda, forcing present and future generations to pay a terrible price.



YOUR GOVERNMENT is moving to deny women here, and all over the world, the right to birth control and abortion.



YOUR GOVERNMENT enforces a culture of greed, bigotry, intolerance and ignorance.



People look at all this and think of Hitler - and they are right to do so. The Bush regime is setting out to radically remake society very quickly, in a fascist way, and for generations to come.



We must act now; the future is in the balance.



Millions and millions are deeply disturbed and outraged by this. They recognize the need for a vehicle to express this outrage, yet they cannot find it; politics as usual cannot meet the enormity of the challenge, and people sense this. There is not going to be some magical "pendulum swing." People who steal elections and believe they're on a "mission from God" will not go without a fight. There is not going to be some savior from the Democratic Party. This whole idea of putting our hopes and energies into "leaders" who tell us to seek common ground with fascists and religious fanatics is proving every day to be a disaster, and actually serves to demobilize people.



But silence and paralysis are NOT acceptable. That which you will not resist and mobilize to stop, you will learn - or be forced - to accept. There is no escaping it: the whole disastrous course of this Bush regime must be STOPPED. And we must take the responsibility to do it. And there is a way. We are talking about something on a scale that can really make a huge change in this country and in the world. We need more than fighting Bush's outrages one at a time, constantly losing ground to the whole onslaught. We must, and can, aim to create a political situation where the Bush regime's program is repudiated, where Bush himself is driven from office, and where the whole direction he has been taking society is reversed. We, in our millions, must and can take responsibility to change the course of history. Acting in this way, we join with and give support and heart to people all over the globe who so urgently need and want this regime to be stopped.



This will not be easy. If we speak the truth, they will try to silence us. If we act, they will try to stop us. But we speak for the majority, here and around the world, and as we get this going we are going to reach out to the people who have been so badly fooled by Bush and we are NOT going to stop. The point is this: history is full of examples where people who had right on their side fought against tremendous odds and were victorious. And it is also full of examples of people passively hoping to wait it out, only to get swallowed up by a horror beyond what they ever imagined.



The future is unwritten. WHICH ONE WE GET IS UP TO US.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...