Your question: " Do we now know why McCarthy suddenly dropped out of the vote for House Speaker? Is it because he was was carrying on a long running affair with a Congresswoman? Multiple sources within Bakersfield, North Carolina, & on Capitol Hill tell Gotnews.com that Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and Renee Ellmers (R-NC) have been carrying on a long-running affair since 2011. The affair is something of an open secret in Washington, D.C. Reporters at other publications, lobbyists, congressional staffers of both parties all know about it. One staffer for a congressman describes it as the “biggest open secret” in D.C. A lobbyist describes Ellmers as a “social climber who has ingratiated herself” with McCarthy."
One of the above is true:
_____ No.
_____ Yes.
_____ Maybe.
But in fact I really do not care, it is a sideshow.
There are far more important things to know about government corruption than that alleged sex lives of elected political hacks.
Those things have no effect on national security.
This does:
"Russian bank hires two former U.S. senators [former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., and former Senator John Breaux, D-La.,] U.S. sanctions against Russia are becoming a boon for Washington's lobbyists", by Alexander Cohen, The Center for Public Integrity, September 2, 2014
• http://www.publicintegrity.org/2014/09/02/15450/russian-bank-hires-two-former-us-senators
"At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family... As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons..."
by JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIRE, 23 April 2014, The New York Times
• http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0
"Caught on open mike, Obama tells Medvedev he needs ‘space’ on missile defense… ‘This is my last election,’ Obama interjects. ‘After my election, I have more flexibility.’ "
by David Nakamura and Debbi Wilgoren, 26 March 2012, Washington Post
• http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-tells-medvedev-solution-on-missile-defense-is-unlikely-before-elections/2012/03/26/gIQASoblbS_story.html
_____________________________________
In case you don't know, negotiating missile defense from the viewpoint of the Russian dictatorship refers to convincing NATO nations to not be able to defend themselves from Russian aggression.
At the same time the above incident occurred, Russian agents provocateurs were exporting Russian nationalist propaganda and Russian weapons to militants in Ukraine. Since that time Russia has annexed Crimea and intends to continue in acquiring territory by the same method.
_____________________________________
“House Chooses New Cold War With Russia… Last week the US House voted overwhelmingly in favor of an anti-Russia resolution so full of war propaganda that it rivals the rhetoric from the chilliest era of the Cold War… The resolution condemns what it claims is a Russian invasion of Ukraine (for which it offers no proof) and Russian violation of Ukrainian sovereignty. But it was the US, by backing a coup against the democratically elected Yanukovich government in February, that first violated that country’s sovereignty.”
by Ron Paul, 7 December 2014 (Pearl Harbor Day)
• http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2014/december/07/house-chooses-new-cold-war-with-russia/
• http://rt.com/usa/211799-paul-congress-russia-war/
“Why is Russian TV Backing Ron Paul?... the Texas congressman is getting enormously favorable coverage from a foreign propaganda outlet—Russia Today television… Russia Today (RT) television, which has been accused of serving as a vehicle for Russia’s intelligence services, puts the question of media coverage of the campaign in a new context—one of foreign interference in U.S. politics. The channel is carried in the Washington, D.C. media market by MHz Networks, a subsidiary of Commonwealth Public Broadcasting, which receives $3 million a year from federal and state government”
by Cliff Kincaid, 16 August 2011, Accuracy In Media
• http://www.aim.org/aim-column/why-is-russian-tv-backing-ron-paul/
_____________________________________
And so on.