Question:
If Obama loses another big state, will you be upset if more superdelegates mover over to Obama's side anyway
anonymous
2008-04-22 18:00:05 UTC
I would be disgusted. It's not right to reward a candidate for losing. Plus, Obama outspent Clinton almost 4 to 1 and still is likely to lose . Talk about a guy who does not deserve this nomination. That is Barack Hussein Obama.
Twelve answers:
castlekeepr
2008-04-22 18:07:47 UTC
No.



He cannot win against McCain. So let him run.
.
2008-04-23 01:10:25 UTC
OK, I'll address the discrepancies in what you're saying one by one.



1) Hillary has more super delegates, even though she's losing in pledged delegates, states won, and popular vote. If "it's not right to reward a candidate for losing", how is that okay?



2) Obama did not outspend Clinton 4 to 1. Even though she said that, they spend almost the same amount in PA. He raised more money than her though.



3) What it comes down to is that Obama and Clinton have the same policies and the same goals for this country. He is just as deserving as her, and they are both a million times better than McCain.
jassie9788
2008-04-23 01:17:13 UTC
big states do not matter...if hillary can somehow tell me how New York and California will go for McCain...then I'll vote for her...come on...California and New York are Democratic strongholds...McCain is weak on the economy and is against the whole country when it comes to the war...The Northeast, West Coast and some mid west states will go for obama no matter what...You look at places like Virginia or South Carolina where Obama won more votes than McCain...those are states that are quite interesting
The Sh*t
2008-04-23 01:10:06 UTC
If he loses another big state, Clinton will have a fairly strong case to present to the superdelegates.
Derail
2008-04-23 01:07:56 UTC
I see your point. What's the use in Democrats voting in the first place if their votes mean nothing, and a nominee is chosen anyway by only a few people in power. But this is one characteristic of the party. Decisions are made at the moment on how it "feels". Not in accordance to logic and fairness.
Pumas for McCain!
2008-04-23 01:04:18 UTC
the more larger populous states she wins the better she can make an argument that she needs to be the nominee to defeat McCain!
anonymous
2008-04-23 01:07:08 UTC
I think he's a dreamer who would do a terrible job. But anyone would be an improvement on Bush.
Tyler D
2008-04-23 01:02:47 UTC
No, it doesn't matter the size of the state. He still has a delegate and popular vote lead.
anonymous
2008-04-23 01:11:17 UTC
well its up to them , it they move there follish but as i say they can run obama if they want but i won't be voting for him
Camiā™„
2008-04-23 01:08:52 UTC
yes i'd be upset, because he still has the popular vote.
anonymous
2008-04-23 01:06:53 UTC
obama needs to die in a cup of fruitcakes.
anonymous
2008-04-23 01:07:09 UTC
wouldnt upset me


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...